hide.me vs Tor (Snowflake) in China
As of , hide.me and Tor (Snowflake) did equally well in our tests from China: each connected in 0 of 2 attempts over the past 24 hours.
Side by side
| Facts | hide.me | Tor (Snowflake) |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Down | Down |
| Overall rank | Not ranked | Not ranked |
| Score | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 24 h success | 0% 0 of 2 | 0% 0 of 2 |
| 7-day success | 0% | 0% |
| Evening speed | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Jitter | — | — |
| Time to connect | — | — |
| Services that open | — | — |
| ChatGPT | No data | No data |
| Download | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Sign-in | No data | Working (better) |
| Plan | Free plan | Free plan |
Which one to pick
- Most reliable connection
- Neither
- Faster in the evening
- Neither
- ChatGPT
- Neither
- Sign in after you arrive
- Tor (Snowflake)
- Download inside China
- Neither
Other comparisons with hide.me
All comparisonsHow we test
- Test line
- China Mobile home broadband in Zhejiang, China
- Frequency
- Each VPN every 2 hours, with its official app
- Successful connection
- Google opens through the VPN
- Working
- 80% or more of connections succeed over 6 hours, at 5 Mbps or more